中

Terminal AI Coding Tools Compared: Claude Code vs Codex CLI vs Gemini CLI

Claude Code, AI Coding, Codex —

Terminal AI coding tools in 2026 have moved far beyond simple code completion.

They’ve evolved into completely different species—different architectural philosophies, different pricing models, different target users.

I spent two days trying out three mainstream tools: Claude Code, Codex CLI, and Gemini CLI. Here are my honest thoughts.

The Verdict First

If you ask for my recommendation:

  • Maximum coding capability → Claude Code ($200/month)
  • Budget-conscious but stable → Codex CLI (free tier sufficient)
  • Multimodal capabilities → Gemini CLI (Google ecosystem)

Of course, this is just my personal judgment. The actual choice depends on your specific needs.

Claude Code: Most Capable, Most Expensive

Let’s start with Claude Code.

Its defining feature is “autonomous agent”—not simple code completion, but understanding entire project context and proactively completing tasks.

I tested several scenarios:

Scenario 1: Code refactoring

I said “refactor this function for better readability.” It not only changed the code but automatically updated related test cases and documentation comments. This capability genuinely impressed me.

Scenario 2: Debugging

I gave it an error message. It automatically analyzed the call chain, identified the problem, and even explained why it occurred.

Scenario 3: Starting from scratch

I said “help me write a simple HTTP server.” It not only wrote the code but automatically created package.json, README, test files—even .gitignore.

Pros:

  • Capability is genuinely strong, 80.8% SWE-bench score, highest currently
  • High autonomy, no hand-holding needed
  • Good understanding of complex projects

Cons:

  • Expensive, $200/month
  • Network-dependent, must connect to Claude API
  • Sometimes “overthinks,” making simple tasks complex

Codex CLI: Best Value Choice

Codex CLI is OpenAI’s product, with free tier offering monthly quota limits.

Its positioning is more like “intelligent command-line assistant”—you ask questions in the terminal, it gives answers.

Scenario 1: Documentation lookup

I asked “how to use grep for recursive search.” It gave me the command directly and explained parameter meanings. Very practical.

Scenario 2: Code snippets

I said “write a Python example for reading CSV.” It gave me code and explained the difference between pandas and csv modules.

Scenario 3: System operations

I asked “how to batch rename files.” It gave me a bash script and reminded me to backup.

Pros:

  • Free, friendly for individual developers
  • Fast response, good for quick lookups
  • Broad coverage, not limited to programming

Cons:

  • Limited understanding of complex projects
  • Low autonomy, needs explicit instructions
  • Free tier has quota limits

Gemini CLI: Multimodal Speciality

Gemini CLI’s standout feature is multimodal capability—it understands images, audio, and video.

Scenario 1: UI screenshots

I gave it a UI screenshot and said “write HTML/CSS based on this.” It actually produced code with decent fidelity.

Scenario 2: Data analysis

I gave it a data chart and said “analyze this trend.” It provided text description and code implementation.

Scenario 3: Audio/video processing

I asked “how to extract audio from video using ffmpeg.” It not only gave the command but drew a flowchart.

Pros:

  • Multimodal capability is unique
  • Good Google ecosystem integration
  • Reasonable pricing (free tier sufficient)

Cons:

  • Pure code capability below Claude Code
  • Requires Google account
  • Mediocre Chinese support

My Recommendation

Honestly, each tool has strengths and weaknesses. No absolute winner.

My usage strategy:

  • Daily work: Codex CLI for quick lookups, simple code generation
  • Complex tasks: Claude Code for refactoring, debugging, project initialization
  • UI-related: Gemini CLI for design specs, data analysis

Actually, 59% of developers use multiple tools in combination rather than relying on just one.

Final Thoughts

Competition among terminal AI coding tools is fundamentally competition in AI coding capabilities.

Claude Code represents the “autonomous agent” direction—AI independently completing complex tasks.

Codex CLI represents the “intelligent assistant” direction—AI helping you quickly complete tasks.

Gemini CLI represents the “multimodal” direction—AI understanding more types of information.

What does the future hold? My personal view: these three directions will eventually converge. But until then, we must choose based on our needs.

Don’t just read about it—try it yourself. The best tool is the one you actually use.

Related Posts